<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Naked Civil&#160;Servant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/</link>
	<description>Musings on physics and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hywel</title>
		<link>http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>hywel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;d say that I have more respect for science journos, and other &#039;technical&#039; journos such as, say, financial or health ones, and less for &#039;gossip&#039; journalists. One thing that has stuck with me is that it is no good whining about a journalist not understanding your topic (which I never did much anyway, but it&#039;s common amongst scientists) - it&#039;s as much the specialist&#039;s job to make sure the public understand what the point of their work is. After all, more often than not the public is paying our salaries...

The main way I am using my course is that I am practising  getting the principal point across in writing *first*, now I have seen how editing is carried out - basically, chopping with scissors from the bottom of the article upwards. Leave the technical detail until the end.

It&#039;s been very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;d say that I have more respect for science journos, and other &#8216;technical&#8217; journos such as, say, financial or health ones, and less for &#8216;gossip&#8217; journalists. One thing that has stuck with me is that it is no good whining about a journalist not understanding your topic (which I never did much anyway, but it&#8217;s common amongst scientists) &#8211; it&#8217;s as much the specialist&#8217;s job to make sure the public understand what the point of their work is. After all, more often than not the public is paying our salaries&#8230;</p>
<p>The main way I am using my course is that I am practising  getting the principal point across in writing *first*, now I have seen how editing is carried out &#8211; basically, chopping with scissors from the bottom of the article upwards. Leave the technical detail until the end.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenward</title>
		<link>http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corycia.net/2008/01/08/the-naked-civil-servant/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>But what did you learn about dealing with the media? Do you plan to exploit your crash course? Do you have perhaps a little more respect for, and understanding of, the poor souls who have to get all that science stuff into the media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what did you learn about dealing with the media? Do you plan to exploit your crash course? Do you have perhaps a little more respect for, and understanding of, the poor souls who have to get all that science stuff into the media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

